requestId:68499aab907cf7.43979093.
Mu Zongsan is a flat land, but it is not impossible to surpass
Author: Fang Xudong (Teacher from Huadong Master Fan’s Department of Philosophy)
Source: Peng Pai News
Time: Confucius was in the 2568th year of Dingyou and the 13th day of the Spring Festival in the Dingyou
Jesus March 10, 2017
[Editor’s Note]
Not long ago, an article titled “These people can represent that the academic world is the ‘unfortunate’ of national academics” was widely circulated in the WeChat circle. The author of the article, Mou Zongsan (1909-1995), whose courtesy name is Fuzhong, was from Jianxia, Shandong. He is from Hubei Public Security Bureau. He is recognized as the most “original” “wise man” philosopher in modern China and is one of the main representatives of modern neo-Confucianism.
The article often faces the negative reviews of representative figures in the history of modern Chinese thinking and academic history such as Hu Yang, Rong Youlan, Liang Shuming, etc. For example, Hu Yang “is not clear about Chinese philosophy.” “Testing to test the Lord, but also taking the test for the test without any knowledge of the Lord, the most basic thing is not to understand the internal problems of the Lord, and only doing some external things.” ; He called the “History of Chinese Philosophy” written by Rong Youlan as “the most basic issue of the focus of philosophy in various periods of the development of Chinese Philosophy”, Rong Youlan “has not been exposed to the most basic issues of philosophy in various periods of the development of Chinese Philosophy, let alone any valuable discussions”; He called Liang Shuming’s famous work “What Civilization and Philosophy” “the new terms created are rootless, and the type of civilization they are said is too simple.”
Modern thinking and academic figures who have suffered severe negative reviews have mostly entered the public domain of tomorrow and are well known to ordinary literary and historical enthusiasts. So, can their academic achievements be as crappy as Mou Zongsan’s “cool comment”? With relevant questions, Peng Pai News (www.thepaper.cn) reporter visited Mr. Fang Xudong, a professor of the Department of Philosophy of Huadong, and asked him to explain the questions briefly.
Fang Xudong was a professor from Anhui Ning, a doctor of philosophy in Beijing. The purpose of the important research and development is Chinese philosophy (especially the purpose of the Song and Ming dynasties), protagonists: Song Wei, Chen Jubai┃Supporting role: Xue Hua┃Others: moral philosophy (especially Confucian tradition). His recent works are “Nine Posts of Science” (Business Printing Library, 2016) and “The Original Life” (Huatong Teacher Fan Daxue Bookstore, 2015Based online car and horse taxi years).
Mu Zongsan’s data picture
Peng Pai News: Teacher Fang is good. I am better than an article by Mou Zongsan in WeChat circle. The topic is “this people can represent that the academic world is the ‘unfortunate’ of national academics.” You are an expert in Chinese philosophical historians, and we want to hear your insights.
Fang Xudong: The article you said is actually an excerpt from a lecture by Mou Zongsan in 1990. Now this topic is added by the editor. Such a topic cannot be said to be eye-catching. Of course, from the perspective of network propaganda, I am afraid that only by placing such a title can the click rate increase. If I copy the original text “Clarity of View and the Recreation of Chinese Civilization” and it would be “fire” as it is now, I am very doubtful. As the saying goes: Look at the inside and look very popular. The “fighting” in the academic world will naturally attract a “melon-eating crowd” to visit.
“It’s hard to learn”: Whether you can’t make a real question depends on whether you are the information
Peng Pai News:This post is suspected of being a “title party”. However, Mou Zongsan identified many people’s names in it, including Hu Ying, Rong Youlan, Liang Shuming, Ma Yifu, and Xiong Shili, who are all reputable figures in the history of modern academic studies. As a professional, don’t you think that we ordinary readers analyze and analyze, is Mou Zongsan’s “cool comment” reasonable?
Fang Xudong: (laughs) This is a pit. You can understand that the Chinese philosophical world has something to say about “Mu Men”. Mou Zongsan is in Hong Kong, especially in Taiwan. There are many students in the world. In the big world, there are also many private students. Like some of my colleagues, it is Mou Zongsan’s book that led them into the door of Chinese philosophy. They respect Mou, and some even went to the fields that were worshipped as gods. Criticizing Mou Zongsan is like “poking a horse and bee” at a certain level.
Since you have found me, it’s better to be reborn than to be reborn. I happened to have a lot of Mou Zongsan’s locations in my research. I took this opportunity to talk and feel the same way, but it was not impossible. If someone takes a tiling behind and causes discussion, it is exactly what you dream of. If I ask Mou Zongsan’s comments reminded me of four words, that is, “It’s hard to learn.”
Peng Pai News:If I hadn’tThere is a mistake. It seems that Mou Zongsan has an article called “It’s not easy to be a person, but difficult to learn”. Does your lecture have anything to do with that article?
Fang Xudong:You said it is right, I did use the allusion from Mou Zongsan’s article. I think that if you want to understand this lecture by Mou Zongsan, it is best to find that article to read along the way. That article was written earlier and was published in the 1968 issue of “Rebirth”. The eight words “It is not easy to be a person, but it is difficult to learn” are actually a verbal sentence by Xiong Shili, the teacher of Mou Zongsan. According to Mou Zongsan’s understanding, “It is difficult to learn” and it is difficult for a person to express the most important location and the most essential location in his life. Mou Zongsan said: “It is not difficult for a person to be honest about the learning and receiving questions from his own focus of life, and it is difficult to find this focus. Assuming that he does not find this focus, we can also say that this person is not a real person in terms of learning; assuming that your academic question does not fall into the place where you focus, we are also Long-term care can be said that you have no real questions.”
The 1990 lecture continued to translate this meaning, and the meaning has changed slightly. True learning should be focused on the focus of one’s life, and it has become: a person should have a corresponding life personality for what he talks about. Mou Zongsan specifically emphasized the word “corresponding” in that speech. What does he mean by “correlation”? It means that learning is consistent with life and character, and it is a kind of spiritual understanding that is not without secrets.
This point can be clearly seen from his comments on Zhou Lianxi (Zhou Dunxi, 1017-1073). He said: “Zhou Lianxi was the founder of the foundation of the Song and Ming dynasties. His view was actually very simple. With just a few sentences, the doctrine of the mean can be well explained clearly without losing the Confucian rule. This completeness depends on corresponding clarity and is not widely viewed in the biology. Therefore, Huang Lizhou’s “Song and Yuan Case” quoted Wu Caohu’s words to Zhou Lianxi: “Tactic understanding of the Tao is wonderful”, and “Tactic understanding of the Tao is wonderful” is what it means The ‘correlation’ is very clear and clear about the image of the doctrine of the mean and easy to express. ” (Huang Lizhou is Huang Zongxi, 1610-1695. Wu Caozhuo was a student of the Yuan Dynasty. ——Note)
Peng Pai News: It turns out that what Mou Zongsan said “is difficult to learn” means. I feel that this does not seem to be difficult to learn how to ask yourself, but ratherIt is said that the focus of the life or life personality of the examiner is not uncommon with the academic questions he wants to study.
Fang Xudong: Yes, it’s pretty clear. Mou Zongsan’s meaning is that if you can’t make real questions, it depends on whether you are the piece of information. And, even if you are that piece of material, you don’t understand it yourself, it’s not okay. Just understand what material it is and then try your best to achieve it with interest.
Peng Pai News: I felt quite mysterious when I was talking about this by Mou Zongsan. This is the kind of awesome talent, no wonder he said, “It&
發佈留言